1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BECK v. KUM & GO, LC
 

BECK v. KUM & GO, LC

Case No. 3:19-cv-00066 KGB.

DANA BECK, Plaintiff, v. KUM & GO, LC, KRAUSEWA, LC, and SENECA COMPANIES, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division.

February 10, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana Beck, Plaintiff, represented by Brandon W. Lacy , Lacy Law Firm.

Kum & Go LC & Krausewa LC, Defendants, represented by Rachel E. Hildebrand , Barber Law Firm PLLC & Samuel Brent Wakefield , Barber Law Firm PLLC.

Seneca Companies Inc, Defendant, represented by Niki Trang Cung , Kutak Rock LLP.

ORDER

Pending before the Court is motion for partial summary judgment submitted by defendants Kum & Go, L.C. ("Kum & Go") and Krausewa, L.C. ("Krausewa") (Dkt. No. 4). Plaintiff Dana Beck filed a response to the motion (Dkt. No. 7). For the following reasons, the Court denies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases