1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 437 F.Supp.3d
  5. 437 F.Supp.3d 927 (2020)
 

IN RE SPRINT NEXTEL DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Case No. 12-2242-JWB-KGG (Lead Case).

437 F.Supp.3d 927 (2020)

IN RE SPRINT NEXTEL DERIVATIVE LITIGATION.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

Signed February 3, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Nature of Suit: 160 Stockholders Suits
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Terri Pagano, Derivatively On Behalf of Sprint Nextel Corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Adam D. Warden , Saxena White, PA, pro hac vice, Elizabeth Susan Metcalf , Safirstein Metcalf LLP, pro hac vice, James P. Frickleton , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC & Peter Safirstein , Safirstein Metcalf LLP, pro hac vice.

NECA-IBEW Pension Trust Plan, Consol Plaintiff, represented by James P. Frickleton , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC, Joseph E. White, III , Saxena White PA, pro hac vice & Lester R. Hooker , Saxena White PA, pro hac vice.

Michael J. Hartleib, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Ex Kano S. Sams, II , Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP, pro hac vice, James P. Frickleton , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC, Patrick W. Powers , Powers Taylor LLP, pro hac vice, Peyton J. Healey , Powers Taylor LLP, pro hac vice, Robert Ahdoot , Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, pro hac vice & Tina Wolfson , Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, pro hac vice.

Jared Rich & Kurtis Friesen, Consol Plaintiffs, represented by James P. Frickleton , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC, Patrick W. Powers , Powers Taylor LLP, pro hac vice, Peyton J. Healey , Powers Taylor LLP, pro hac vice & Willie C. Briscoe , The Briscoe Law Firm, PLLC.

Stephen Robaczynski, Consol Plaintiff, represented by James P. Frickleton , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC.

Robert R. Bennett, Gordon M. Bethune, Larry C. Glasscock, James H. Hance, Jr., Daniel R. Hesse, V. Janet Hill, Frank Ianna, Sven-Christer Nilsson, William R. Nuti & Rodney O'Neal, Defendants, represented by Jennifer L. Berhorst , Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, LLP, Marc D. Ashley , Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP, pro hac vice, Robert M. Kirby , Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP, pro hac vice, Thomas J. McCormack , Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP, pro hac vice & W. Perry Brandt , Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, LLP.

Sprint Nextel Corporation, Defendant, represented by Benjamin Nicholas Hazelwood , Williams & Connolly, LLP, pro hac vice, Kenneth Jerome Brown , Williams & Connolly, LLP, pro hac vice, Mark W. McGrory , Erise IP, PA & Matthew Hardwick Blumenstein , Williams & Connolly, LLP, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on motions to dismiss by Defendant Sprint Communications, Inc. and by the individually-named Defendants.2 (Docs. 88, 91.) The motions have been fully briefed. (Docs. 96, 97, 98-1, 99-1,3

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases