1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PENNINGTON v. FLUOR CORPORATION
 

PENNINGTON v. FLUOR CORPORATION

Civil Action Nos. 0:17-cv-02094-JMC, 0:17-cv-02201-JMC

Harry Pennington III and Timothy Lorentz, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Fluor Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Daniel Maintenance Services, Inc., SCANA Corporation, and South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Defendants. Lawrence Butler, Lakeisha Darwish, and Jimi Che Sutton, Plaintiffs, v. Fluor Corporation and Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Rock Hill Division.

January 27, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 WARN Act
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Pennington, III, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated & Timothy Lorentz, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, represented by Lucy Clark Sanders , Bloodgood and Sanders, Jack A. Raisner , Raisner Roupinian LLP, pro hac vice, Nancy Bloodgood , Bloodgood and Sanders & Rene S. Roupinian , Raisner Roupinian LLP, pro hac vice.

Fluor Corporation & Fluor Enterprises Inc, Defendants, represented by John Hagood Tighe , Fisher and Phillips, Matthew Robert Korn , Fisher and Phillips LLP, David Kresser , Fisher and Phillips LLP, pro hac vice & Kathleen McLeod Caminiti , Fisher and Phillips LLP, pro hac vice.

SCANA Corporation & South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Defendants, represented by Charles T. Speth, II , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC, D. Michael Henthorne , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC, James Roy Silvers , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart, Piper Reiff Byzet , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart & Christopher Ray Thomas , Ogletree Deakins Nash Smoak and Stewart PC.

Fluor Daniel Maintenance Services Inc, Defendant, represented by John Hagood Tighe , Fisher and Phillips & Matthew Robert Korn , Fisher and Phillips LLP.

ORDER

Before the court is the parties' jointly filed Motion to Approve Mediator (ECF Nos. 203, 157). It appearing to the court that counsel for the parties have selected MICHAEL E. DICKSTEIN, Esquire, by agreement, as their mediator;

IT IS SO ORDERED that MICHAEL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases