SEVERSTAL WHEELING, INC. v. WPN CORPORATION

Case No. 10 Civ. 954 (LTS)(GWG).

SEVERSTAL WHEELING, INC. RETIREMENT COMMITTEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WPN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 6, 2020.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Severstal Wheeling, Inc. Retirement Committee, Timothy S. Rogers, William Drew Landon, as named fiduciaries of the Wheeling Corrugating Company Retirement Security Plan, the Salaried Employee's Pension Plan of Severstal Wheeling, Inc. & Richard Caruso, Plaintiffs, represented by Michael Benjamin Eisenkraft , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll P.L.L.C., Robert Joseph Barton , Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice & Scott Michael Lempert , Cohen Milstein Seller & Toll PLLC.

Melvin Baggett, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Joseph Barton , Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice & Monya Monique Bunch , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC.

The Wheeling Corrugating Company Retirement Security Plan & The Salaried Employees' Pension Plan of Severstal Wheeling, Plaintiffs, represented by Robert Joseph Barton , Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C., pro hac vice & Michael Benjamin Eisenkraft , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll P.L.L.C.

WPN Corporation, in its own capacity and as named fiduciary of the Wheeling Corrugating Company Retirement Security Plan and the Salaried Employee's Pension Plan of Severstal Wheeling, Inc., Defendant, pro se.

Ronald Labow, in his individual capacity, Defendant, pro se.

Ronald Labow, as named fiduciary of the Wheeling Corrugating Company Retirement Security Plan and the Salaried Employee's Pension Plan of Severstal Wheeling, Inc., Defendant, pro se.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR COSTS FOR MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' POST-JUDGMENT REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND POST-JUDGMENT INTERROGATORIES AND FOR RELATED SANCTIONS

Pursuant to the Court's previous Order [ECF No, 333] and Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases