1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SPENDLOVE v. RapidCOURT, LLC
 

SPENDLOVE v. RapidCOURT, LLC

Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-856.

OWEN SPENDLOVE, et al., Individually and as Representatives of the Class, Plaintiffs, v. RAPIDCOURT, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division.

December 20, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Owen Spendlove, individually and as representatives of the class, Plaintiff, represented by Craig Carley Marchiando , Consumer Litigation Associates, Eleanor Michelle Drake , Berger & Montague PC, pro hac vice, Elizabeth W. Hanes , Consumer Litigation Associates, Joseph Christopherson Hashmall , Berger & Montague PC, pro hac vice, Andrew Joseph Guzzo , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Casey Shannon Nash , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Kristi Cahoon Kelly , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Matthew James Erausquin , Consumer Litgation Associates PC & Leonard Anthony Bennett , Consumer Litigation Associates.

Jacob Cross, individually and as representatives of the class, Plaintiff, represented by Eleanor Michelle Drake , Berger & Montague PC, pro hac vice, Joseph Christopherson Hashmall , Berger & Montague PC, pro hac vice, Andrew Joseph Guzzo , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Casey Shannon Nash , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Elizabeth W. Hanes , Consumer Litigation Associates, Kristi Cahoon Kelly , Kelly Guzzo PLC, Matthew James Erausquin , Consumer Litgation Associates PC & Leonard Anthony Bennett , Consumer Litigation Associates.

RapidCourt, LLC, Defendant, represented by Steven David Brown , Isler Dare PC, Edward Cadagin , Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, pro hac vice, Henry Chalmers , Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, pro hac vice, Lindsey Ann Strachan , Isler Dare PC & Morgan Ellen McCloy Harrison , Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR RULE 37(c)(1) SANCTIONS (ECF No. 72). Having considered the supporting, opposing, and reply memoranda, and for the reasons stated below, PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR RULE 37(c)(1) SANCTIONS (ECF No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases