DERRICK v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS

Civil Action No. 19-1541.

DERRICK, THROUGH AND WITH HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER TINA, et al., v. GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

December 19, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DERRICK, THROUGH AND WITH HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER TINA, WALTER, THROUGH AND WITH HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER JANEVA, THOMAS, THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND AND MOTHER MICHELLE & SEAN, THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND AND GRANDMOTHER ANDREA, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, represented by FRED T. MAGAZINER , DECHERT LLP, MARSHA L. LEVICK , JUVENILE LAW CENTER, MAURA I. MCINERNEY , EDUCATION LAW CENTER, MICHAEL H. MCGINLEY , DECHERT LLP, NADIA MOZAFFAR , JUVENILE LAW CENTER, KRISTINA MOON , EDUCATION LAW CENTER & MARGARET M. WAKELIN , EDUCATION LAW CENTER.

GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS & RANDY IRESON, FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, Defendants, represented by JOSEPH J. MCHALE , STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP, BRANDON MICHAEL RILEY , STRADLEY RONON STEVENS & YOUNG & JOSEPH THOMAS KELLEHER , STRADLEY, RONON, STEVENS & YOUNG, LLP.

TERESA D. MILLER, SECRETARY OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, THEODORE DALLAS, FORMER SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, CATHY UTZ, DEPUTY SECRETARY FOR THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN, YOUTH, AND FAMILIES IN HER INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, PEDRO A. RIVERA, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION OF THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY & PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants, represented by HENRY E. HOCKEIMER, Jr. , BALLARD SPAHR LLP, KAITLIN M. GURNEY , Ballard Spahr LLP, PAUL LANTIERI, III , BALLARD SPAHR et al & ELIZABETH A. ANZALONE , PA DEPT OF EDUCATION.

CHESTER COUNTY INTERMEDIATE UNIT, Defendant, represented by ANDREW E. FAUST , SWEET STEVENS KATZ & WILLIAMS LLP & JASON D. FORTENBERRY , Sweet Stevens Katz & Williams LLP.

ANDRE WALKER, Defendant, represented by FRANCIS J. DEASEY , DEASEY, MAHONEY VALENTINI, NORTH, LTD & RUFUS A. JENNINGS , DEASEY, MAHONEY & VALENTINI, LTD.

ROBERT TAYLOR, Defendant, represented by GARY M. SAMMS , OBERMAYER REBBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPELL LLP & EDVARD LARS WILSON , OBERMAYER REBMANN MAXWELL & HIPPEL LLP.


MEMORANDUM

Now pending before the court are various motions of defendants challenging plaintiffs' complaint. There are motions to strike plaintiffs' entire complaint under Rules 8 and 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or, in the alternative, to strike plaintiffs' class...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases