Cheryl KATER and Suzie Kelly, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,
v.
CHURCHILL DOWNS INCORPORATED, a Kentucky corporation, and Big Fish Games, Inc., a Washington corporation, Defendants.
Manasa Thimmegowda, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
Big Fish Games, Inc., a Washington corporation; Aristocrat Technologies Inc., a Nevada corporation; Aristocrat Leisure Limited, an Australian corporation; and Churchill Downs Incorporated, a Kentucky corporation, Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Signed November 19, 2019.
Signed November 19, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Nature of Suit: 380 Personal Property: Other Source: PACER
ORDER ON TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND LIMITED RELIEF FROM LITIGATION STAY
Ronald B. Leighton, United States District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motions for Temporary Restraining Order and Limited Relief from Litigation Stay [Dkt. #s 73 (in Thimmegowda) and 122 (in Kater...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.