GLENDALE OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Case No. 2:18-cv-10542-DSF-E.

GLENDALE OUTPATIENT SURGERY CENTER, Plaintiff(s), v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendant(s).

United States District Court, C.D. California.

October 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glendale Outpatient Surgery Center, a California corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Mina Hakakian , Williams Law Firm PC & Richard D. Williams , Williams Law Firm PC.

Aetna Life Insurance Company, a health benefits corporation doing business in California, Defendant, represented by Matthew Gregory Kleiner , Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP.


Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Aetna Life Insurance Company failed to plead or otherwise defend within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases