CHILL v. CALAMOS ADVISORS LLC

15 CIV. 1014 (ER).

417 F.Supp.3d 208 (2019)

Saul CHILL and Sylvia Chill, for the use and benefit of the Calamos Growth Fund, Plaintiffs, v. CALAMOS ADVISORS LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Filed October 9, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 80a-3
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 80a-3 Investment Company Act of 1940
Nature of Suit: 160 Stockholders Suits
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ira M. Press , Andrew Martin McNeela , I Mark Allen Strauss , Kirby McInerney LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs.

Catherine Vera Wigglesworth , Tiffany Engsell , Dechert LLP, Philadelphia, PA, David Adam Kotler , Dechert, LLP, New York, NY, Matthew L. Larrabee , Dechert LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

This opinion considers whether a mutual fund investment adviser breached the "fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services" that is imposed by § 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "ICA") (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 80a-35(b)).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases