IN RE IMPINJ, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION

No. C18-5704RSL.

414 F.Supp.3d 1327 (2019)

IN RE IMPINJ, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle.

Filed October 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a)
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Montemarano, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Karl Phillip Barth , HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP & Steve W. Berman , HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP.

Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Avi Josefson , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN, pro hac vice, Jonathan D. Uslaner , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN, pro hac vice, Lauren M. Cruz , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, pro hac vice, Michael D. Blatchley , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN, pro hac vice, Salvatore Graziano , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN, pro hac vice & Bradley S. Keller , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP.

Impinj, Inc, Chris Diorio, Evan Fein & Eric Brodersen, Defendants, represented by Christopher M. Petroni , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, Barry M. Kaplan , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, Gregory Lewis Watts , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI & Stephanie Lynn Jensen , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI.

Anthony Katsune, Movant, represented by Colin M. George , ARDENT LAW GROUP PLLC.

Foo Kwan, Movant, represented by Karl Phillip Barth , HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP & Steve W. Berman , HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP.

Employees' Retirement System of the City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge, Movant, represented by Jonathan D. Uslaner , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN, pro hac vice, Lauren M. Cruz , BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMAN LLP, pro hac vice & Bradley S. Keller , BYRNES KELLER CROMWELL LLP.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter comes before the Court on "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Consolidated Class Action Complaint." Dkt. # 41-1 at 7-37. Defendants argue that plaintiffs' allegations of falsity, scienter, and loss causation do not satisfy the pleading...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases