1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. KHOJA v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 

KHOJA v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.

Case No. 15-CV-540 JLS (JLB).

KARIM KHOJA, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. OREXIGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC., JOSEPH P. HAGAN, MICHAEL A. NARACHI, and PRESTON KLASSEN, Defendants. AND ALL CONSOLIDATED CASES.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

September 23, 2019.

Editors Note
Cause: No cause code entered
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karim Khoja, Plaintiff, represented by Alayne Karen Gobeille , Kahn Swick & Foti LLC, pro hac vice, Alexander Louis Burns , Kahn Swick Foti LLC, pro hac vice, Ramzi Abadou , Kahn Swick Foti LLP & Stephen Richard Basser , Barrack Rodos and Bacine.

Kurt R. Yantz, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Samuel M. Ward , Barrack Rodos and Bacine, Stephen Richard Basser , Barrack Rodos and Bacine & Danielle Suzanne Myers , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP.

Gerald J. Stefanko, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Jennifer Pafiti , Pomerantz LLP & Jeremy A. Lieberman , Pomerantz LLP, pro hac vice.

Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., Joseph P. Hagan & Michael A. Narachi, Defendants, represented by Jeffrey David Lombard , Cooley LLP, Jessica V. Santamaria , Cooley, LLP, John C. Dwyer , Cooley, LLP, Mary Kathryn Kelley , Cooley Godward Kronish & Dane Robert Voris , Cooley LLP.

Preston Klassen, Defendant, represented by Jeffrey David Lombard , Cooley LLP, John C. Dwyer , Cooley, LLP, Mary Kathryn Kelley , Cooley Godward Kronish & Dane Robert Voris , Cooley LLP.

Hau Dang, Movant, represented by Laurence M. Rosen , The Rosen Law Firm, P.A.

Aasan P. Derik, Movant, represented by Jon Anders Tostrud , Tostrud Law Group PC.

Nicholas Menonna, Movant, represented by Robert Vincent Prongay , Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP.

Claudia Knight, Movant, represented by Danielle Suzanne Myers , Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP & Samuel M. Ward , Barrack Rodos and Bacine.

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOVING DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, (2) DENYING LEAD PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOVING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

(ECF Nos. 98, 98-15, 103-1)

Presently before the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases