1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 413 F.Supp.3d
  5. 413 F.Supp.3d 569 (2019)
 

U.S. EX REL. FISHER v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.

CIVIL ACTION No. 4:16-CV-00395.

413 F.Supp.3d 569 (2019)

UNITED STATES of America, EX REL., Michael J. FISHER, Keith Franklin, Chezza Hartfield, and Regina McPhaul v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division.

Signed September 9, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Cause: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Nature of Suit: 376 Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a))
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mazin Ahmad Sbaiti , Sbaiti & Company PLLC, Dallas, TX, Geoffrey Lloyd Harrison , Laranda Moffett Walker , Shawn L. Raymond , Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX, Jason Louis Lichtman , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Stephen Lee Shackelford, Jr. , Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, Roger D. Sanders , Sanders O'Hanlon , Motley & Young, Sherman, TX, for Michael J. Fisher, Keith Franklin, Chezza Hartfield.

James Garland Gillingham , United States Attorney's Office, Tyler, TX, Mazin Ahmad Sbaiti , Sbaiti & Company PLLC, Dallas, TX, for United States of America.

Mazin Ahmad Sbaiti , Sbaiti & Company PLLC, Catherine Carlyle Jobe , Boyd & Associates, Dallas, TX, Geoffrey Lloyd Harrison , Laranda Moffett Walker , Shawn L. Raymond , Susman Godfrey LLP, Houston, TX, Jason Louis Lichtman , Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, Stephen Lee Shackelford, Jr. , Susman Godfrey LLP, New York, NY, Roger D. Sanders , Sanders O'Hanlon , Motley & Young, Sherman, TX, for Reggie McPhaul.

Elizabeth Lemond McKeen , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, Jonathan Rosenberg , Anton Metlitsky , Asher Rivner , O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New YorK, NY, Darren P. Nicholson , Burns Charest LLP, Edwin Sawyer Neely , Mark Daniel Strachan , Richard Alan Sayles , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Dallas, TX, for JPMorgan Chase Bank NA.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Under the Public Disclosure Bar (Dkt. #106). Having considered the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases