ANDERSON v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION

No. 3:18-cv-02013-HZ.

400 F.Supp.3d 1113 (2019)

Loriann ANDERSON, Kerrin Fiscus, Kenneth Hill, Rene Layton, Michael Miller, Bernard Perkins, Dennis Richey, Kathie Simmons, Kent Wiles, and Melinda Wiltse, as individuals and representatives of the respective requested classes, Plaintiffs, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU) LOCAL 503, Oregon Public Employees Union (OPEU); Oregon AFSCME Council 75, labor organizations; Katy Coba, in her official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services; Jackson County, Lane County, Marion County, Wallowa County, City of Portland, political subdivisions of the State of Oregon; Western Oregon University, a public higher educational institution; Northwest Senior & Disability Services, a local intergovernmental agency, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.

Signed September 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James G. Abernathy , Rebekah C. Millard , Freedom Foundation, Olympia, WA, Milton L. Chappell , Pro Hac Vice, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc., Springfield, VA, Jill Gibson , Gibson Law Firm, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs.

Amanda C. Lynch , Pro Hac Vice, Matthew J. Murray , Pro Hac Vice, Scott A. Kronland , Pro Hac Vice, Altshuler Berzon , San Francisco, CA, James S. Coon , Thomas, Coon, Newton & Frost, Carla Scott , Scott J. Kaplan , Oregon Department of Justice, Margaret S. Olney , Bennett, Hartman, Morris & Kaplan, LLP, P.K. Runkles-Pearson , Jeffrey P. Chicoine , Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP, Portland, OR, Devin D. Huseby , Joel C. Benton , Jackson County Counsel, Medford, OR, Jane E. Vetto , Marion County Counsel, Salem, OR, Robert E. Franz, Jr. , Law Office of Robert E. Franz, Jr., Springfield, OR, for Defendants.


OPINION & ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim [24].1 For the reasons that follow, Defendants' motion is granted, and Plaintiffs' case is dismissed.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases