1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CURTIS v. NESSEL
 

CURTIS v. NESSEL

Case No. 1:19-cv-00112.

MATTHEW CURTIS, Plaintiff, v. DANA NESSEL, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

August 7, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew T. Curtis, plaintiff, pro se.

Dana Nessel, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, in her official capacity, defendant, represented by James Patrick Kennedy , MI Dept Attorney General Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division & Mark Gordon Sands , MI Dept Attorney General.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brought this action against the Michigan Attorney General, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that Michigan's statutory prohibition on private gambling violates his rights under the First, Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases