DAO v. FAUSTIN

Case No. 1:19-cv-649.

402 F.Supp.3d 308 (2019)

Melaney DAO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Paul M. FAUSTIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

Signed August 29, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter Charles Cohen , Hans Harris Chen , Charlson Bredehoft Cohen & Brown PC, Reston, VA, for Plaintiffs.

Gregory David Grant , Shulman Rogers Gandal Pordy & Ecker PA, Potomac, MD, Edward Lee Isler , Michelle Bodley Radcliffe , Isler Dare PC, Vienna, VA, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

This case arises from the alleged workplace harassment of plaintiffs Dao and Khan, former employees of defendant Infused Solutions, LLC ("Infused"), by defendant Faustin, the Chief Financial Officer of defendant Infused. In the Second Amended Complaint...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases