1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 406 F.Supp.3d
  5. 406 F.Supp.3d 305 (2019)
 

EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC.

18 Civ. 5880 (LGS).

406 F.Supp.3d 305 (2019)

EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. REPRO-MED SYSTEMS INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Signed August 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Right to Compensation - Patent Laws
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David John Hoffman , Law Office David J. Hoffman, New York, NY, William P. Ramey, III , Pro Hac Vice, Ramey & Schwaller, LLP, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff.

Christopher M. Jackson , Pro Hac Vice, Eric E. Johnson , James G. Sawtelle , Pro Hac Vice, Peter George Koclanes , Sherman & Howard L.L.C., Denver, CO, Daniel Walden Roberts , Law Offices of Daniel W. Roberts, Superior, CO, Henry Andreas Gabathuler , Hoda Rifai-Bashjawish , Matthew Louis Kaufman , Robert M. Isackson , Leason Ellis LLP, White Plains, NY, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff EMED Technologies ("EMED") alleges that Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc. ("RMS") infringed United States Patent No. 9,808,576 (the "'576 Patent"), titled "Devices and Methods for Protecting a User from a Sharp Tip of a Medical Needle." The '576 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases