1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHURE, INC. v. ClearONE, INC.
 

SHURE, INC. v. ClearONE, INC.

No. 17 C 3078.

SHURE, INC., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. CLEARONE, INC., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 25, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shure Incorporated, Plaintiff, represented by Bradley F. Rademaker , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Vladimir I. Arezina , VIA Legal, LLC, Charles Shih , Neal Gerber & Eisenberg Llp, Daniel Mark Terhune , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Michael R. Turner , Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, Tanvi B. Patel , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg & Thomas James Campbell, Jr. , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

ClearOne, Inc., Defendant, represented by Douglas J. Dixon , Hueston Hennigan LLP, Christina Von Der Ahe Rayburn , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice, Garret A. Leach , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, John C. Hueston , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice, Michael Acquah , HUESTON HENNIGAN LLP, Neil G. Anderson , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice, SOURABH MISHRA , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice, Scott Aidan Skiles , Kirkland & Ellis Llp & Xinlin L. Morrow , The Morrow Firm, pro hac vice.

ClearOne, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Douglas J. Dixon , Hueston Hennigan LLP, Garret A. Leach , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Michael Acquah , HUESTON HENNIGAN LLP, SOURABH MISHRA , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice & Xinlin L. Morrow , The Morrow Firm, pro hac vice.

Biamp Systems Corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Matthew David Satchwell , DLA Piper LLP, Michael Gavin Strapp , DLA Piper LLP, pro hac vice, Steven John Reynolds , DLA Piper LLP & Michael Gavin Strapp , DLA Piper LLP.

QSC Audio Products, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Douglas Lawrence Sawyer , Perkin Coie LLP, Grant E. Kinsel , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Kevin Andrew Zeck , Perkins Coie, pro hac vice.

Shure Incorporated, Counter Defendant, represented by Bradley F. Rademaker , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Vladimir I. Arezina , VIA Legal, LLC, Charles Shih , Neal Gerber & Eisenberg Llp, Daniel Mark Terhune , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Tanvi B. Patel , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Michael R. Turner , Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP & Thomas James Campbell, Jr. , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

QSC, LLC, Counter Defendant, represented by Douglas Lawrence Sawyer , Perkin Coie LLP, Grant E. Kinsel , Perkins Coie LLP & Kevin Andrew Zeck , Perkins Coie.

Shure Incorporated, Counter Claimant, represented by Bradley F. Rademaker , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Vladimir I. Arezina , VIA Legal, LLC, Tanvi B. Patel , Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg & Michael R. Turner , Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

ClearOne, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Douglas J. Dixon , Hueston Hennigan LLP, Garret A. Leach , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Michael Acquah , HUESTON HENNIGAN LLP, SOURABH MISHRA , Hueston Hennigan LLP, pro hac vice, Xinlin L. Morrow , The Morrow Firm, pro hac vice & Scott Aidan Skiles , Kirkland & Ellis Llp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This litigation concerns two patents on audio conferencing technology. Shure, Inc. sued its competitor ClearOne (the owner of the patents), seeking a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement at first on U.S. Patent No. 9,635,186.1 R. 1, Compl...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases