1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN RE INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION
 

IN RE INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-12396-ADB.

In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION (Indirect Purchasers).

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

August 21, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Property Damage
Nature of Suit: 380 Personal Property: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sherri Cummisford, Consolidated Plaintiff, represented by Allan Kanner , Allan Kanner & Associates, pro hac vice, Conlee S. Whiteley , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, Denise L. Morris , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP, John D. Blythin , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP, Layne Hilton , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, Mark A. Eldridge , Ademi & O'Reilly LLP, Ruben Honik , Golomb & Honikl, P.C., pro hac vice & Shpetim Ademi , Ademi & O'Reilly.

Carmen Richard, Consolidated Plaintiff, represented by Allan Kanner , Allan Kanner & Associates, pro hac vice, Bradley Winston , Winston Law Firm, Conlee S. Whiteley , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, David J. Stanoch , Golomb & Honik, P.C., pro hac vice, Layne Hilton , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice & Ruben Honik , Golomb & Honikl, P.C., pro hac vice.

Tina Picone, Plaintiff, represented by Allan Kanner , Allan Kanner & Associates, pro hac vice, Annemieke A. Tennis , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, Conlee S. Whiteley , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, David J. Stanoch , Golomb & Honik, P.C., pro hac vice, Layne Hilton , Kanner & Whiteley, LLC, pro hac vice, Ruben Honik , Golomb & Honikl, P.C., pro hac vice & Stephen Herbert Galebach , Galebach Law Office.

Shire U.S. Inc. & Shire LLC, Defendants, represented by David S. Shotlander , Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLLP, pro hac vice, David A. Zwally , Haug Partners LLLP, pro hac vice, Michael F. Brockmeyer , Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, pro hac vice, Nicholas F. Giove , Haug Partners LLP, pro hac vice, Fred A. Kelly, Jr. , Haug Partners, Joshua S. Barlow , Haug Partners LLP & Tarae L. Howell , Nixon & Peabody, LLP.

Actavis Elizabeth LLC & Actavis Holdco U.S., Inc., Defendants, represented by Aviv A. Zalcenstein , Goodwin Procter LLP, pro hac vice, Alicia Rubio-Spring , Goodwin Procter LLP, Christopher T. Holding , Goodwin Procter, LLP, Sarah K. Frederick , Goodwin Procter LLP & Srikanth K. Reddy , Goodwin Procter, LLP.

Actavis Inc., Defendant, represented by Aviv A. Zalcenstein , Goodwin Procter LLP, pro hac vice & Christopher T. Holding , Goodwin Procter, LLP.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Intervenor, represented by Christopher T. Holding , Goodwin Procter, LLP.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This pay-for-delay case involves allegations that the Defendants settled patent litigation over the ADHD drug Intuniv on anticompetitive terms. The Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs ("IPPs") are parents and caretakers who purchased Intuniv (the brand name for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases