TUCKER v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A.

18 Civ. 3155 (KPF).

399 F.Supp.3d 105 (2019)

Brady TUCKER, Ryan Hilton, and Stanton Smith, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CHASE BANK USA, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Signed August 1, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Nature of Suit: 371 Truth in Lending
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Harris, Jr. , Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Alan Schoenfeld , Noah Adam Levine , Stephanie Simon , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs Brady Tucker, Ryan Hilton, and Stanton Smith used Chase Bank credit cards to buy various "cryptocurrencies." From 2017 until early 2018, Defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase") classified Plaintiffs' acquisitions of cryptocurrency as "purchases...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases