VASCULAR IMAGING PROFESSIONALS v. DIGIRAD CORP.

Case No. 19cv486 JM(MSB).

401 F.Supp.3d 1005 (2019)

VASCULAR IMAGING PROFESSIONALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. DIGIRAD CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

Signed July 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332nr
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332nr Diversity - Notice of Removal
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric John Medel , Medel Law Group APC, Irvine, CA, for Plaintiff.

Brian A. Katz , Pro Hac Vice, Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, New York, NY, Joseph Thomas Ergastolo , Wright, L'Estrange & Ergastolo, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

Presently before the court is a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants Digirad Corporation ("Digirad Corp.") and Digirad Imaging Solutions, Inc. ("Digirad Imaging") (collectively "Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases