1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. STONER v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
 

STONER v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Case No. 5:16-CV-01045-JAK(PLAx).

SCOTT STONER, an individual, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity, DEPUTY RICHARD FRANSIK, an individual, DEPUTY MICHAEL HEUER, an individual, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

July 12, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott Stoner, an individual, Plaintiff, represented by Brian T. Dunn , Cochran Firm California & Megan R. Gyongyos , Cochran Firm California.

County of Riverside, a municipal entity & Deputy Richard Fransik, an individual, Defendants, represented by Anthony M. Sain , Manning and Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP & Lynn Louise Carpenter , Manning and Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP.

AMENDED JUDGMENT

After a Jury Trial conducted on January 8-11, and 15, 2019, the Jury rendered a verdict with respect to all remaining, operative causes of action brought by the plaintiff, Scott Stoner ("Plaintiff"), against defendants Richard Fransik ("Fransik") and the County of Riverside. Specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases