MALDEN TRANSPORTATION v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES

Civil Action No. 16-12538-NMG consolidated with: 16-12651-NMG, 17-10142-NMG, 17-10180-NMG, 17-10316-NMG, 17-10598-NMG, 17-10586-NMG.

386 F.Supp.3d 96 (2019)

MALDEN TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and Rasier, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Signed July 3, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 410 Anti - Trust
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. O'Konski , Daniel J. McGonagle , Joseph S. Sano , Paul J. Hayes , Walter B. Prince , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Edward F. Haber , Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Beatriz Mejia , Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CA, John C. Dwyer , Pro Hac Vice, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Michael Sheetz , Adam S. Gershenson , Julianne Landsvik, Michael E. Welsh , Timothy W. Cook , Bryan Koch, Cooley LLP, Pro Hac Vice, Boston, MA, Christopher G. Timson , Law Offices of Christopher G. Timson, PC, Norwood, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

This case involves a suit by taxi medallion holders ("the Anoush plaintiffs" or "plaintiffs") in the Greater Boston area who allege that Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC (collectively "Uber" or "defendants") competed unlawfully and unfairly in the on-demand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases