1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. GROISMAN v. GOLDBERG & RIMBERG PLLC
 

GROISMAN v. GOLDBERG & RIMBERG PLLC

No. 18-CV-7989 (JPO).

DANIEL GROISMAN, Plaintiff, v. GOLDBERG & RIMBERG PLLC and ISRAEL GOLDBERG, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 26, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332lm
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332lm Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Nature of Suit: 380 Personal Property: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Groisman, Plaintiff, represented by Joseph H. Neiman , Joseph H. Neiman.

Goldberg & Rimberg PLLC & Israel Goldberg, Esq., Defendants, represented by Benjamin Michael Oxenburg , Furman, Kornfeld & Brennan LLP.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Daniel Groisman brings this legal malpractice action against his former attorneys, Defendants Goldberg & Rimberg PLLC and Israel Goldberg (together, "Goldberg"). Goldberg has now moved to dismiss Groisman's complaint for failure to state a cognizable claim to relief or, barring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases