1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 392 F.Supp.3d
  5. 392 F.Supp.3d 1074 (2019)
 

DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD. v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No. 18-cv-05546-EMC.

392 F.Supp.3d 1074 (2019)

DIVA LIMOUSINE, LTD., Plaintiff, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed June 20, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Geibelson , Aaron M. Sheanin , Robins Kaplan LLP, Mountain View, CA, Ashley Conrad Keller , Pro Hac Vice, Seth Adam Meyer , Pro Hac Vice, Thomas Kayes , Pro Hac Vice, Travis Lenkner , Pro Hac Vice, Keller Lenkner LLC, Chicago, IL, Tai Snow Milder , Office of the Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, Warren D. Postman , Pro Hac Vice, Keller Lenkner, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff.

Brian C. Rocca , Kent Michael Roger , Sujal Shah , Minna L. Naranjo , Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Docket Nos. 33, 113

Plaintiff Diva Limousine ("Diva"), a licensed provider of livery services in California, brings this putative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases