1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MURRAY v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC.
 

MURRAY v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC.

Case No. 1:18-CV-01492-LJO-SKO.

RODERICK MURRAY, an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Plaintiff, v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant(s).

United States District Court, E.D. California.

June 3, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick Murray, an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan Melmed , Melmed Law Group P.C. & Craig Justin Ackermann , Ackermann & Tilajef, PC.

Scelzi Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant, represented by S. Brett Sutton , Sutton Hague Law Corporation, P.C..

RENEWED JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC.'S DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING; ORDER

(Doc. 16)

Plaintiff RODERICK MURRAY (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC. (hereinafter "Defendant") hereby stipulate and agree, by and through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases