1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 383 F.Supp.3d
  5. 383 F.Supp.3d 1069 (2019)
 

ROMERO v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Case No.: 16cv1283 JM (MDD).

383 F.Supp.3d 1069 (2019)

Juan ROMERO; Frank Tiscareno; and Kenneth Elliott, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

Signed April 17, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3)
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey M. Raux , Pro Hac Vice; Foley & Lardner LLP, Boston, MA, Kas L. Gallucci , Michael Houchin, Adam Belsey , Ronald Marron , Law Office of Ronald Marron, Eileen Regina Ridley , J. Mark Waxman , Nicholas J. Fox , Foley & Lardner, LLP, San Diego, CA, Robert L. Teel , Law Office of Robert L. Teel, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs.

Adam R. Fox , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL

Defendant Securus Technologies, Inc. ("Securus") moves the court for a stay pending the Ninth Circuit's resolution of its Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f) appeal. (Doc. No. 160.) Plaintiffs oppose. (Doc. No. 163.) For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases