FUTREAL v. RINGLE

No. 7:18-CV-29-FL.

ROBERT FUTREAL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of ELNA FUTREAL, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN RINGLE, TRUE'S CUSTOM FLOOR COVERINGS, INC., ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY SOUTHEAST, LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division.

April 3, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rupert Futreal, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of ELNA FUTREAL, Plaintiff, represented by Michael Scott Rainey , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A., David Aaron Senter, Jr. , Young, Moore & Henderson, P.A., George Braxton Price , Hunter & Price, P.A. & Justin B. Hunter .

Enterprise Leasing Company - Southeast, LLC, Defendant, represented by Robert Anthony Hartsoe , Hartsoe & Associates, P.C.

Dustin Ringle, Defendant, represented by Camilla Frances DeBoard , Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, LLP, Lyn K. Broom , Teague, Rotenstreich & Stanaland & Mallory G. Horne , Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, LLP.

Trues Custom Floor Coverings, Inc, Defendant, represented by Devlin K. Horton , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP, Jeffrey H. Blackwell , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP & Joshua D. Neighbors , Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo LLP.

Enterprise Leasing Company - Southeast, LLC, Cross Claimant, represented by Robert Anthony Hartsoe , Hartsoe & Associates, P.C.

Dustin Ringle, Cross Defendant, represented by Camilla Frances DeBoard , Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, LLP & Mallory G. Horne , Teague, Rotenstreich, Stanaland, Fox & Holt, LLP.

Trues Custom Floor Coverings, Inc, Cross Defendant, represented by Devlin K. Horton , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP & Jeffrey H. Blackwell , Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP.


ORDER

The court has been advised that the parties have settled all matters in controversy among them. Therefore, this matter is DISMISSED subject to the right of any party to file a motion to reopen the case should settlement not be consummated within 45 days hereof. The parties are directed to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases