1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 377 F.Supp.3d
  5. 377 F.Supp.3d 670 (2019)
 

REAGAN NAT. ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN v. CITY OF AUSTIN

1:17-CV-673-RP.

377 F.Supp.3d 670 (2019)

REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN, INC., and Lamar Advantage Holding Company, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.

Signed March 27, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Russell Horton , Taline Manassian , George Brothers Kincaid & Horton, LLP, Austin, TX, Bradley E. McLain , SettlePou, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs.

Henry Gray Laird, III , City of Austin Law Department, Austin, TX, for Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

By ordinance, the City of Austin prohibits new digital signs for off-premises signs, but permits them for on-premises signs. The plaintiffs own and operate billboards. They contend that the City's different rules for on- and off...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases