1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. CAREY v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.
 

CAREY v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.

No. 7:17-CV-201-D.

VICTORIA CAREY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division.

March 26, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Property Damage
Nature of Suit: 380 Personal Property: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victoria Carey, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Jamie L. Bowers , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Jay J. Chaudhuri , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Theodore J. Leopold , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Andrew O. Whiteman , Whiteman Law Firm, Douglas J. McNamara , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Gary K. Shipman , Shipman & Associates, LLP, Jordan W. Connors , Susman Godfrey LLP, Stephen Douglas Bunch , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Stephen E. Morrissey , Susman Godfrey LLP & Steven M. Seigel , Susman Godfrey LLP.

Marie Burris & Michael Kiser, Plaintiffs, represented by Gary K. Shipman , Shipman & Associates, LLP, Jay J. Chaudhuri , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC, Steven M. Seigel , Susman Godfrey LLP & Theodore J. Leopold , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC.

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company & The Chemours Company, FC, LLC, Defendants, represented by Jonathan D. Sasser , Ellis & Winters, LLP, John K. Sherk , Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kenneth J. Reilly , Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP, Mark D. Anstoetter , Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP & Stephen D. Feldman , Ellis & Winters, LLP.

Brent Nix, Interested Party, represented by Steven M. Seigel , Susman Godfrey LLP & Theodore J. Leopold , Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLLC.

Cape Fear Public Utility Authority, Interested Party, represented by Joseph A. Ponzi , Brooks Pierce McLendon Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P..

ORDER

On March 2, 2018, defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs' consolidated class-action complaint [D.E. 49] and filed a memorandum in support [D.E. SO]. On April 13, 2018, plaintiffs responded in opposition [D.E. 60]. On April 27, 2018, defendants replied [D.E. 66].

The court GRANTS IN PART...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases