1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 377 F.Supp.3d
  5. 377 F.Supp.3d 1156 (2019)
 

UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER v. UNITED STATES E.P.A

CV-16-52-GF-BMM.

377 F.Supp.3d 1156 (2019)

UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendants, and State of Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Treasure State Resources Association of Montana, Montana League of Cities and Towns, and National Association of Clean Water Agencies Defendants and Intervenors.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division.

Signed March 25, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Cause: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katherine K. O'Brien , Jenny K. Harbine , Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund — BOZEMAN, Bozeman, MT, Janette K. Brimmer , Pro Hac Vice, Stephanie K. Tsosie , Pro Hac Vice, Earthjustice, Seattle, WA, Albert F. Ettinger , Pro Hac Vice, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff.

Alan D. Greenberg , Daniel W. Pinkston , U.S. Department of Justice Environmental Defense Section, Denver, CO, for Defendants.

Jeffery J. Oven , Mark L. Stermitz , Crowley Fleck PLLP — Billings, Billings, MT, M. Christy S. McCann , Catherine A. Laughner , Browning Kaleczyc Berry & Hoven, P.C. — Bozeman, Bozeman, MT, Chad E. Adams , Browning Kaleczyc Berry & Hoven, Murry Warhank , Jackson, Murdo & Grant, P.C., Matthew Dolphay , Crowley Fleck PLLP — Helena, Intervenor Defendant Kurt R. Moser , Montana Department of Environmental Quality, Sarah A. Bond , Office of the Montana Attorney General, Helena, MT, Fredric P. Andes Barnes & Thornburg, LLP — Chicago Chicago, IL Paul M. Drucker , Barnes & Thornburg, LLP — Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants and Intervenors.

ORDER

Plaintiff Upper Missouri Waterkeeper ("Waterkeeper") moves for summary judgment in its First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 148.) Waterkeeper asserts two causes of action. Waterkeeper first alleges that EPA's approval of Montana's numeric nutrient criteria for nitrogen and phosphorous,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases