1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 374 F.Supp.3d
  5. 374 F.Supp.3d 1039 (2019)
 

PERFECT CO. v. ADAPTICS LTD.

Case No. 3:14-cv-05976-RBL.

374 F.Supp.3d 1039 (2019)

PERFECT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ADAPTICS LIMITED, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma.

Signed March 19, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt Marcus Rylander , Mark E. Beatty , Rylander & Associates PC, Vancouver, WA, Richard D. McLeod , McLeod Law LLC, Woodland, WA, for Plaintiff.

Amy K. Liang , Pro Hac Vice, Brian Jacobsmeyer , Pro Hac Vice, Jeremy J. Taylor , Pro Hac Vice, Joe Craig , Pro Hac Vice, Baker Botts LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Hannah Jo Jackowski , Neil Armstrong Dial , Eisenhower & Carlson, Tacoma, WA, Mark Oda, Pro Hac Vice, Reilly T. Stoler , Pro Hac Vice, Wayne O. Stacy , Pro Hac Vice, Baker Botts LLP, Anthony J. Patek , Pro Hac Vice, Todd Kennedy , Pro Hac Vice, Gutride Safier LLP, San Francisco, CA, Lauren J. Dreyer , Pro Hac Vice, Baker Botts, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DKT. ## 317 & 321

INTRODUCTION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Adaptics Limited's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Dkt. ## 317, 321. The underlying patent dispute in this case concerns...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases