1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 374 F.Supp.3d
  5. 374 F.Supp.3d 734 (2019)
 

STEMM v. TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC.

18 C 2289.

374 F.Supp.3d 734 (2019)

Paige STEMM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

Signed March 19, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Nature of Suit: 370 Other Fraud
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Naomi B. Spector , Pro Hac Vice, KamberLaw LLP, La Jolla, CA, Adam C. York , Michael James Aschenbrener , KamberLaw LLC, Chicago, IL, Christopher Decker Moon , Pro Hac Vice, Moon Law APC, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff.

Benjamin Eli Haskin , Nathan H. Lichtenstein , Aronberg, Goldgehn, Davis & Garmisa, Chicago, IL, David M. Jolley , Pro Hac Vice, Covington & Buling LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff Paige Stemm filed this suit on behalf of herself and a putative class, alleging that Defendant Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. ("Tootsie Roll") packaged and sold its Junior Mints candy product in opaque boxes that hid the large amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases