CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS v. SDIF

Case No. 17-cv-05287-JST.

374 F.Supp.3d 897 (2019)

CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, Plaintiff, v. SCHNEIDER DOCK & INTERMODAL FACILITY, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed March 19, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Cause: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Nature of Suit: 893 Environmental Matters
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Nazar Carlon , Andrew L. Packard , Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard, Petaluma, CA, David Hutching Williams , Law Offices of David Williams, Walnut Creek, CA, William Leonard Verick , Klamath Environmental Law Center, Arcata, CA, for Plaintiff.

Therese Yvonne Cannata , Kimberly A. Almazan , Mark Philip Fickes , Qwalyne Elise Lawson , Cannata O'Toole Fickes & Olson LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: ECF No. 67

Before the Court is Plaintiff Californians for Alternatives to Toxics's ("CAT") motion for partial summary judgment. ECF No. 67. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases