SCHUMAN v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC.

Case No. 16-cv-05544-HSG.

372 F.Supp.3d 1054 (2019)

Peter SCHUMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed March 12, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cliff Michael Palefsky , Keith A. Ehrman , McGuinn Hillsman & Palefsky, Connie K. Chan , Michael Rubin , Andrew Edward Kushner , Raphael N. Rajendra , Altshuler Berzon LLP, San Francisco, CA, William B. Reilly , Law Office of William Reilly, Mill Valley, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Mark E. Schmidtke , Pro Hac Vice, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak, Stewart, P.C., Valparaiso, IN, Elizabeth M. Soveranez , Kristina Holmstrom , Pro Hac Vice, Mark Gerard Kisicki , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Phoenix, AZ, Sean Patrick Nalty , Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaim. See Dkt. No. 76 ("Mot."). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss, without leave to amend.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases