OTTO v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 17-CV-4712 (GHW) (JLC).

JONATHAN OTTO, Plaintiff, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

February 21, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cause: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nature of Suit: 820 Copyright
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Otto, Plaintiff, represented by James H. Freeman , Liebowitz Law Firm, PLLC & Richard Liebowitz , Liebowitz Law Firm, PLLC.

Hearst Communications, Inc., Defendant, represented by Ravi Viren Sitwala , Hearst Corporation, Jonathan R. Donnellan , Hearst Corporation Office of the General Counsel & Nathaniel Scott Boyer , The Hearst Corporation.


OPINION AND ORDER

Settlement conferences are the lifeblood of a magistrate judge's work. Over time, we handle hundreds and eventually thousands of them. As a result, it is an all-too-familiar experience for a magistrate judge—or anyone engaged as a mediator—to observe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases