CHAD SANDINE; GROUNDHOGZ EXPRESS, INC.; and GROUNDHOGZ LOGISTICS, INC., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants,
v.
DON TATE; and TATE EXPRESS, INC., Defendants/Counter-Claimants.
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 6, 2019.
March 6, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other Source: PACER
Don Tate & Tate Express Inc, Defendants, represented by Randy Ford Taub , Law Office of Randy Ford Taub, pro hac vice & Philip E. Kaplan , Williams & Anderson, PLC.
Tate Express Inc & Don Tate, Counter Claimants, represented by Randy Ford Taub , Law Office of Randy Ford Taub, pro hac vice & Philip E. Kaplan , Williams & Anderson, PLC.
Groundhogz Express Inc, Groundhogz Logistics Inc & Chad Sandine, Counter Defendants, represented by Blake Williams Wilcox , Wilcox Law Firm & Tony L. Wilcox , Wilcox Law Firm.
ORDER
D.P. MARSHALL, JR., District Judge.
1. The Court appreciates the parties' submissions to chambers yesterday afternoon, all of which are attached to this Order. The Tates' alternative plan for their exhibits is fine.
2. Don Tate has elected to proceed as a party to the contract. He no longer disputes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
