1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SPORTS MANAGEMENT NETWORK v. BUSCH
 

SPORTS MANAGEMENT NETWORK v. BUSCH

Case No. 17-10413.

SPORTS MANAGEMENT NETWORK, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. KURT BUSCH, AND KURT BUSCH INC., Defendants, v. FRASCO, CAPONIGRO, WINEMAN, & SCHEIBLE, PLLC, AND JOHN CAPONIGRO, Counter-Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 6, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sports Management Network, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Dean M. Googasian , Googasian Law Firm, George A. Googasian , Googasian Law Firm & Thomas H. Howlett , Googasian Law Firm.

Kurt Busch & Kurt Busch, Inc., Defendants, represented by Eugene Driker , Barris, Sott, John T. Sheets , Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC & Todd R. Mendel , Barris, Sott.

Allan R. Miller P.C., Interested Party, represented by Michael J. Bill , Alan R. Miller P.C.

Stewart-Haas Racing, LLC, Interested Party, represented by Jeffrey G. Muth , Miller Johnson.

Penske Racing South, Inc., Interested Party, represented by Arthur Thomas O'Reilly , Jones Day.

Andretti Autosport Holding Company & Attorney James C Thomas, Interested Partys, represented by James C. Thomas , James C. Thomas, P.C.

Kurt Busch, Inc. & Kurt Busch, Counter Claimants, represented by Eugene Driker , Barris, Sott, John T. Sheets , Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC & Todd R. Mendel , Barris, Sott.

Frasco Caponigro Wineman & Scheible, PLLC & Caponigro P. John, Counter Defendants, represented by David C. Anderson , Collins, Einhorn, Jeffrey R. Hicks , The Meridian Law Group, Lindsey A. Peck , Collins Einhorn Farrell PC & Michael J. Sullivan , Collins, Einhorn.

Sports Management Network, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by David C. Anderson , Collins, Einhorn & Dean M. Googasian , Googasian Law Firm.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [121/123]; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [122]; DENYING COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [151/153]; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTER-DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [95]; AND DENYING AS MOOT COUNTER-DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [95]

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases