1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 371 F.Supp.3d
  5. 371 F.Supp.3d 641 (2019)
 

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v. ACER INC.

Case No. 18-cv-01885-HSG.

371 F.Supp.3d 641 (2019)

KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ACER INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Signed March 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael P. Kelly , Benjamin A. Smyth , Daniel M. Silver , McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE, Caitlyn N. Bingaman , Pro Hac Vice, Christopher M. Gerson , Pro Hac Vice, Daniel A. Apgar , Pro Hac Vice, Jaime F. Cardenas-Navia , Pro Hac Vice, Jonathan M. Sharret , Pro Hac Vice, Joyce L. Nadipuram , Pro Hac Vice, Robert Scott Pickens , Pro Hac Vice, Sean M. McCarthy , Pro Hac Vice, John D. Carlin , Venable LLP, Julian G. Pymento , Pro Hac Vice, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper, and Scinto, New York, NY, Christopher T. Holland , Ethan Isaac Jacobs , Lori L. Holland , Holland Law LLP, San Francisco, CA, Nicole Yvonne Stoddard , Pro Hac Vice, Michael P. Sandonato , Pro Hac Vice, Natalie D. Lieber , Pro Hac Vice, for Plaintiffs.

Erika H. Warren , Matthew S. Warren , Patrick M. Shields , Amy Marie Bailey , Warren Lex LLP, San Francisco, CA, Aaron P Maurer , Pro Hac Vice, Andrew V. Trask Pro Hac Vice, Bruce R Genderson , Pro Hac Vice, Christopher Scott Geyer , Christopher Alan Suarez , Pro Hac Vice, David M. Krinsky , Pro Hac Vice, Williams & Connolly, LLP, Kevin Hardy , Pro Hac Vice, Kyle Thomason , Pro Hac Vice, Sanjiv Prakash Laud , Williams and Connolly LLP, Washington, DC, Craig R. Kaufman , Pro Hac Vice, Hsiang James H. Lin , Pro Hac Vice, Kaiwen Tseng TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, Eleanor Gail Tennyson , Rodger Dallery Smith, II , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE, Patrick Fitch , Warren Lex LLP, Boston, MA, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S AND INTERVENOR-PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

Re: Dkt. Nos. 94, 105

Pending before the Court are two motions for judgment on the pleadings, one filed by Defendants Acer Inc. and Acer America Corporation (collectively, "Acer"),...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases