1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BAUMAN v. SAXE
 

BAUMAN v. SAXE

Case No. 2:14-cv-01125-RFB-PAL.

JEREMY BAUMAN, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID SAXE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

February 13, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bijan Razilou, Consol Plaintiff, represented by Amanda L. Stevens , Bailey Kennedy, LLP, Dennis L. Kennedy , Bailey Kennedy, Matthew R. Mendelsohn , Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC, pro hac vice, Paul C. Williams , Bailey Kennedy, LLP & Payam Shahian , Strategic Legal Practices, APC, pro hac vice.

Jeremy Bauman, Plaintiff, represented by Albert H. Kirby , Sound Justice Law Group, PLLC, Candice Renka , Marquis & Aurbach, Phillip S. Aurbach , Marquis & Aurbach & Michael David Maupin , c/o Marquis Aurbach Coffing.

Saxe Management LLC, V Theater Group LLC & David Saxe, Defendants, represented by James H. Corning , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice, Kenneth E. Payson , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice & Jeffrey A. Silvestri , McDonald Carano Wilson.

Saxe Theater, LLC, Defendant, represented by James H. Corning , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice & Kenneth E. Payson , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice.

Twilio, Inc., Defendant, represented by Adam Daniel Bowser , Arent Fox LLP, Michael Brian Hazzard , Jones Day, Joel D. Henriod , Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP & Kenneth E. Payson , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.

David Saxe Productions, LLC & David Saxe Productions, Inc., Consol Defendants, represented by Carrie McCrea Hanlon , Pyatt Silvestri & Hanlon, Chtd., James H. Corning , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice, Kenneth E. Payson , Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, pro hac vice & Jeffrey A. Silvestri , McDonald Carano Wilson.

ORDER

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Twilio, Inc. ECF No. 177.1 For the reasons discussed below, the Motion to Dismiss is denied.

II. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs' instant complaint is their Consolidated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases