1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 358 F.Supp.3d
  5. 358 F.Supp.3d 962 (2019)
 

MANNING v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Case No. 18-cv-02931-HSG (JSC).

358 F.Supp.3d 962 (2019)

Lucius MANNING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Filed February 6, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Ratner , David Ratner Law Firm, Walnut Creek, CA, Avi Kaufman , Pro Hac Vice, Kaufman P.A., Miami, FL, Simon Seiver Grille , Girard Sharp LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Tiffany Cheung , Lucia X. Roibal , Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Adam James Hunt , Pro Hac Vice, Morrison Foerster LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Re: Dkt. No. 68

Plaintiffs sued Uber for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Uber has moved to compel Plaintiff Christopher Ziers to arbitrate his claim. (Dkt. No. 64.) In support of that motion, Uber submitted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases