F.E.R.C. v. SILKMAN

1:16-cv-00205-JAW.

359 F.Supp.3d 66 (2019)

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. Richard SILKMAN, et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

Signed January 4, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew K. Lizotte , U.S. Attorney's Office, Portland, ME, Demetra E. Anas , Elizabeth K. Canizares , Michael Raibmak , Nicholas G. Stavlas , Jeffrey L. Phillips , US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Peter J. Brann , Stacy O. Stitham , Brann & Isaacson, Lewiston, ME, for Respondents.


ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

An energy consulting company and its employee and managing member challenge FERC's assessment of civil penalties against them for violating FERC's anti-manipulation rule, alleging that the action brought in this Court by FERC is time-barred under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases