DEREK A. HEYLIGER, Plaintiff,
v.
A. CYMBRAK, et al. Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 26, 2018.
December 26, 2018.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Derek A. Heyliger, Plaintiff, pro se.
Andrew Cymbrak, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Christopher Lagree, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Kyle Guynup, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, A. Mussen, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Kevin Wilcox, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Liam Mahoney, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, William Perry, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Lafountain, in his individual capacity as Correctional Officer; Clinton Correctional Facility, Anthony Annucci, in his individual capacity as DOCCS CORC Acting Commissioner of Corrections, Karen Bellemy, in her individual capacity as DOCCS CORC Director Inmate Grievance Program, Catherine Leahy Scott, in her individual capacity as New York State Inspector General, Charles Simpson, in his individual capacity as DOCCS CORC Inmate Grievance Coordinator, Jason Effman, in his individual capacity as DOCCS CORC Inmate Grievance Program Coordinator & Rebecca Loren, in her individual capacity as DOCCS CORC Inmate Grievance Program Coordinator, Defendants, represented by William A. Scott , New York State Attorney General.
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID E. PEEBLES, Magistrate Judge.
Currently pending before the court in connection with this matter are the third, fourth, and fifth motions brought by pro se plaintiff Derek A. Heyliger to compel discovery. Dkt. Nos. 47, 48, 54. Collectively, in those motions plaintiff seeks an order compelling a response to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.