1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. REEDOM v. CITY OF TULARE
 

REEDOM v. CITY OF TULARE

Case No. 1:18-cv-01366 LJO SKO.

BOBBY REEDOM, individually and as successor in interest to Jontell Reedom, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF TULARE, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

December 20, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anyka Harris, individually and as successor-in-interest to Jontell Reedom, Plaintiff, represented by Dale K. Galipo , Law Offices of Dale K. Galipo.

Bobby Reedom, individually and as Successor in Interest to Jontell Reedom, deceased, Plaintiff, represented by Brian T. Dunn , The Cochran Firm & Megan Ruth Gyongyos , The Cochran Firm.

City of Tulare, Defendant, represented by Bruce Daniel Praet , Ferguson Praet and Sherman.

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (Doc 12)

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

On December 5, 2018, by Minute Order and in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency, the court continued the Initial Scheduling Conference in Harris v. City of Tulare to be held in conjunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases