1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 356 F.Supp.3d
  5. 356 F.Supp.3d 1323 (2018)
 

ENGINEERED ARRESTING SYSTEMS CORP. v. ATECH, INC.

Case No. 5:14-CV-00518-MHH.

356 F.Supp.3d 1323 (2018)

ENGINEERED ARRESTING SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ATECH, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northeastern Division.

Filed November 20, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Kaufmann , Frank M. Caprio , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Huntsville, AL, Dean Wall Russell , Jennifer Fairbairn Deal , William Howard Brewster , Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, Jeremy A. Schachter , Pro Hac Vice, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff

Jerome S. Gabig, Jr. , Christopher Lea Lockwood , Richard R. Raleigh, Jr. , Wilmer & Lee, P.A., Huntsville, AL, Thomas R. DeBray, Jr. , Will Hill Tankersley , Balch & Bingham LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Engineered Arresting Systems Corporation (ESCO) claims that the defendants Atech, Inc., SCAMA AB, Philip Ahagen, and Harald Ahagen infringed on ESCO's "BAK-12" and "PORTARREST" trademarks in violation of the Lanham Act when the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases