ACCELERATION BAY LLC v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC.

Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00453-RGA.

ACCELERATION BAY LLC, Plaintiff, v. ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

October 17, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Acceleration Bay LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Philip A. Rovner , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Aaron M. Frankel , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Austin Manes , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Cristina Martinez , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Hannah Lee , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, James R. Hannah , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Jonathan A. Choa , Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP, Lisa Kobialka , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Marcus A. Colucci , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Paul J. Andre , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, Shannon H. Hedvat , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice, William Hannah , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice & Yuridia Caire , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, pro hac vice.

Activision Blizzard Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendant, represented by Jack B. Blumenfeld , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, John C. Phillips, Jr. , Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A., Aaron E. Hankel , Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, B. Trent Webb , Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, Jordan T. Bergsten , Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, Joseph C. Masullo , Winston & Strawn LLP, pro hac vice, McGraw C. Maxwell , Shook Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., pro hac vice, Michael A. Tomasulo , Winston & Strawn LLP, pro hac vice & Stephen J. Kraftschik , Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP.

Sony Interactive Entertainment America, LLC, Intervenor, represented by Gregory Brian Williams , Fox Rothschild LLP.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Presently before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Preclude Inadmissible and Undisclosed Damages Theories and Evidence. (D.I. 581). The Parties have briefed the issues. (D.I. 581, 583, 587). For the reasons set out below, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART.

I. BACKGROUND...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases