1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FINJAN, INC. v. JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.
 

FINJAN, INC. v. JUNIPER NETWORK, INC.

No. C 17-05659 WHA.

FINJAN, INC., Plaintiff, v. JUNIPER NETWORK, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

October 4, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Finjan, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by James R. Hannah , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Lisa Kobialka , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Austin W. Manes , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Cristina Lynn Martinez , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP, Kristopher Benjamin Kastens , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP, Michael H. Lee , Kramer Levin, Phuong Diem Nguyen , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP, Shannon Hedvat , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP & Paul J. Andre , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP.

Juniper Network, Inc., Defendant, represented by Joshua Popik Glucoft , Irell and Manella LLP, Casey May Curran , Irell and Manella LLP, Jonathan S. Kagan , Irell & Manella LLP, Kevin X. Wang , Irell and Manella LLP, Rebecca Lyn Carson , Irell & Manella LLP & Sharon Soohyun Song .

Juniper Network, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Joshua Popik Glucoft , Irell and Manella LLP, Casey May Curran , Irell and Manella LLP, Jonathan S. Kagan , Irell & Manella LLP, Kevin X. Wang , Irell and Manella LLP, Rebecca Lyn Carson , Irell & Manella LLP & Sharon Soohyun Song .

Finjan, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by James R. Hannah , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Lisa Kobialka , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Austin W. Manes , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, LLP, Kristopher Benjamin Kastens , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP, Michael H. Lee , Kramer Levin, Paul J. Andre , Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Phuong Diem Nguyen , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP, Cristina Lynn Martinez , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP & Shannon Hedvat , Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel LLP.

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

The Court has received a letter dated October 4 from defendant Juniper Network, Inc., requesting that an interrogatory answer quoted on page two be useable in the related IPR proceeding notwithstanding the protective order in this case (Dkt. No. 199). The Court is inclined to agree...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases