OUTDOOR VENTURE CORPORATION v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Civil Action No. 6:16-cv-182-KKC.

OUTDOOR VENTURE CORPORATION, STEARNS MANUFACTURING, KENTUCKY HIGHLANDS INVESTMENT CORPORATION, J.C. EGNEW, and L. RAY MONCRIEF, Plaintiffs, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., SCOTTSDALE INDEMNITY COMPANY, AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, and OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division, Londan.

September 27, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Nature of Suit: 110 Insurance
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Outdoor Venture Corporation, Stearns Manufacturing, Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation, J.C. Egnew & L. Ray Moncrief, Plaintiffs, represented by D. Duane Cook , Cook & Watkins, PLC & John M. Sosbe , Cook & Watkins, PLC.

Grange Mutual Casualty Co., Defendant, represented by Blake Charles Nolan , Taylor Law Group, PLLC, James W. Taylor , Taylor Law Group, PLLC & Robert L. Steinmetz , Gwin Steinmetz & Baird PLLC.

Scottsdale Indemnity Company, Defendant, represented by Jill Fran Endicott , Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP.

Auto-Owners Insurance Company & Owners Insurance Company, Defendants, represented by Catherine M. Sewell , Sewell & Neal, PLLC & Peter J. Sewell , Sewell & Neal, PLLC.

Scottsdale Indemnity Company, Counter Claimant, represented by Jill Fran Endicott , Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP.

J.C. Egnew, Kentucky Highlands Investment Corporation, L. Ray Moncrief, Outdoor Venture Corporation & Stearns Manufacturing, Counter Defendants, represented by D. Duane Cook , Cook & Watkins, PLC & John M. Sosbe , Cook & Watkins, PLC.

Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Counter Claimant, represented by Catherine M. Sewell , Sewell & Neal, PLLC & Peter J. Sewell , Sewell & Neal, PLLC.

Grange Mutual Casualty Co., Counter Claimant, represented by Blake Charles Nolan , Taylor Law Group, PLLC & James W. Taylor , Taylor Law Group, PLLC.


SOUTHERN DIVISION AT LONDON OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment (DE 52, 54, 55, 58). The defendants are all insurance companies. The plaintiffs were insured by one or more of the insurance companies. With this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases