South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Plaintiff,
v.
Swain E. Whitfield, in his official capacity as Chairman of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; Comer H. Randall, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; John E. Howard, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; Elliott F. Elam, Jr., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; Elizabeth B. Fleming, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; Robert T. Bockman, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission; and G. O'Neal Hamilton, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, Defendants.
United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 28, 2018.
July 28, 2018.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nature of Suit: 950 Constitutional - State Statute Source: PACER
Swain E Whitfield, in his official capacity as Chairman of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, Comer H Randall, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, John E Howard, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, Elliott F Elam, Jr, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission & G O'Neal Hamilton, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, Defendants, represented by John M. Reagle , Childs and Halligan & Thomas Kennedy Barlow , Childs and Halligan.
Thomas J Ervin, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the South Carolina Public Service Commission, Defendant, represented by John M. Reagle , Childs and Halligan.
This matter is before the court pursuant to Joseph E. Wojcicki's ("Movant") pro se Motion to Intervene seeking permissive intervention under Rule 24(b)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 71 at 1.) For the reasons set out below, the court DENIES
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
