TILCHEN v. CEMD ELEVATOR CORP.

No. 17 Civ. 00051 (PAC).

Steven Tilchen, Plaintiff, v. CEMD Elevator Corp. d/b/a City Elevator, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

July 10, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Tilchen, Plaintiff, represented by Douglas Evan Rowe , Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman & Paul Andrew Pagano , Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman.

CEMD Elevator Corp., doing business as City Elevator & Mitchell Hellman, Defendants, represented by Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP, Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Lisa M. Casa , Forchelli,Curto,Deegan,Schwartz,Mineo,Cohn & Terrana, LLP.

Stephan Diemer & Carl Alongis, Defendants, represented by Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP.

Mitchell Hellman & CEMD Elevator Corp., Counter Claimants, represented by Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP, Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Lisa M. Casa , Forchelli,Curto,Deegan,Schwartz,Mineo,Cohn & Terrana, LLP.

Steven Tilchen, Counter Defendant, represented by Douglas Evan Rowe , Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman & Paul Andrew Pagano , Certilman, Balin, Adler & Hyman.

Stephan Diemer & Carl Alongis, Counter Claimants, represented by Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP.

Stephan Diemer & Carl Alongis, Counter Defendants, represented by Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP.

CEMD Elevator Corp. & Mitchell Hellman, Counter Defendants, represented by Elbert Nasis , Forchelli, Deegan & Terrana LLP, Danielle Brigette Gatto , Forchelli, Curto, Deegan, Schwartz Et Al & Lisa M. Casa , Forchelli,Curto,Deegan,Schwartz,Mineo,Cohn & Terrana, LLP.


ORDER

Plaintiff's motion (Docket 74 filed on April 18, 2018) for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, is denied. The motion is untimely; discovery has already concluded. Furthermore, it appears that the proposed additional materials fail to state a claim. It is axiomatic that a contract's validity depends...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases