1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 587 B.R.
  5. 587 B.R. 589 (2018)
 

ZAPOTOCKY v. CIT BANK, N.A.

17-cv-6377 (JGK).

587 B.R. 589 (2018)

Darren P. ZAPOTOCKY, Plaintiff, v. CIT BANK, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

Filed June 22, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 430 Banks and Banking
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darren P. Zapotocky, Bridgeport, CT, for Plaintiff.

Catherine E. Welker , Nafiz Cekirge , New York, NY, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

The pro se plaintiff, Darren P. Zapotocky, brings this action alleging that CIT Bank, N.A., breached his reverse mortgage contract by requiring him to obtain flood insurance. Zapotocky also challenges

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases